Tuesday, April 5, 2016
flaws
I think that both articles create problems and they have a hard time explaining the story. The weirdest thing that puts them in a strange position is the fact that the NFL participant moved and is working with a tobacco company and that they made is such a big part of the article. I think there are many things wrong with the story and overall its just a bit of a mistake but I think they should be aloud to keep the story because the Times has a good pat record with stories.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
YOU can't really say that the Times should rest on this story because of its reputation. They need to support the story based on the merits of the reporting in the story itself and nothing else. If you think there are problems with the story, you should argue for a retraction or clarification. 88
ReplyDelete